In the church family, every follower of Jesus is a member, every member is a minister and every minister is a leader.
The problem with my definition of functional leadership is that it cuts across the grain of common sense. We all know the old idiom, “too many chefs in the kitchen spoil the pot.” Or some may be familiar with the less politically correct adage, “too many chiefs and not enough Indians.” But does this sentiment really apply to the church? I would guess that most people think it does apply and Tyler’s comment a while back is a good example.
I agree that every believer in a member and minister, but everyone a leader? Sure, every believer could become a leader – but You seem to be miss using the term “leader”. By its simplest meaning – in a group, the leader is the ONE person who is leading – out in front with both the authority and responsibility of decision. The others are “followers”. Without this distinction, then no one is really the leader and the group goes nowhere. see “committee”
Unfortunately in our Western culture, we prefer to think of leadership as referring to the one person making decisions, calling the shots and telling others what to do. I think, however, Jesus saw leadership as something deeper. Biblical leaders serve, sacrifice, and lead by example rather than force.
…a gal who takes initiative and leads a women’s Bible study
…the couple who hosts a home group and models hospitality
…the teenager who organizes others to serve in the community
…a woman who demonstrates integrity at her workplace
Leaders for a Different Time
Leadership is not a permanent job status. A mature Christian can step in and out of a leadership role depending on the situation. A leader can lead for a season and follow in another season of life. According to the book of Acts, Barnabus began the First Missionary Journey as the leader-prophet, but eventually Paul became the leader-teacher of the mission.
I know some men who have served as pastors for years, and now they have moved out of pastoral ministry into other areas of leadership. They may no longer have the “up-front role”… yet they are still great leaders in different ways.
Diversity of Leaders for a Diversity of Groups
Leadership happens in different spheres of influence. I can lead my church as an Elder, but if I go on a missions project that someone else puts together, I don’t step in and take control. According to God’s design, I allow the other person to be the leader, to set the agenda, to give direction, to speak, etc… Ultimately, even as an Elder, I am still just one brother among the many and can accept direction, honor others, be a servant, and foster the leadership of others.
Regarding 
Regarding 
Regarding 
Regarding 
Regarding 
Regarding 
What distinction do you make in your church between being a leader and being a deacon, elder, pastor, etc. Are those positional roles irrelevant?
Hi Tyler,
As I say in the post, there are leaders of a different kind. Elders are one kind of leader that reflect a specific calling that is important to the life of church. BUT being a leader is not a job description for one calling, it is a maturity issue for all disciples of Jesus to lead within the sphere of influence God has given us.
Do you think there is only one “leader” in the church and no one else can be called a leader except the Pastor?
Please see this blog on maturity
and
this 13 part series on Elders in the church.
Let me know if that helps answer your question Tyler.