Recognizing Biblical Authority

August 4th, 2009 by J.R. Miller Leave a reply »

Our church is moving through a study Paul’s second letter to the Corinthians.  This past week we looked into chapter 10 where Paul defends his own Apostolic authority and refutes the false authority of others who are disrupting the church.  This bring us a great question, how can we recognize biblical authority?

Carl F.H. Hentry, has a great intro the problem of authority that is worth a look.

The problem of authority is one of the most deeply distressing concerns of contemporary civilization. Anyone who thinks that this problem specially or exclusively embarrasses Bible believers has not listened to the wild winds of defiance now sweeping over much of modern life. Respect for authority is being challenged on almost every front and in almost every form.

In many ways this questioning of authority is a good thing. The Bible stresses that all derived authority must answer to the living God for its use, misuse and abuse. In our time totalitarian pretenders and spurious authorities have wielded devastating power to the psychic wounding of many people. The story of thousands of persons acting under Nazi orders to exterminate six million Jews is but one case in point. As Stanley Milgram reminds us, even reputable professional people willing to obey the orders of superiors despite questions of conscience lend themselves to brutality (Obedience to Authority). The further fact that those in power bend authority for self-serving and immoral ends, and often under the pretext of serving others and advancing good causes, can only rouse skepticism over the legitimacy of any and all authority. The Bible throughout sternly condemns oppressive and exploitive miscarriages of power; Jesus pointedly contrasts those who use power to “lord it over” others (Matt. 20:24–28) with those who serve God truly.

How to justify any human authority becomes an increasingly acute problem. Not only religious authority, but political, parental, and academic authority as well come under debate.

Carl Ferdinand Howard Henry, God, Revelation, and Authority (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 1999), 4:7.

Henry’s comments bring us to the point of Paul’s letter and his discussion of authority. In the end of 2 Cor 9, Paul gives a loving encouragement that the Corinthians should be faithful to their commitments and continue giving to the Church in Macedonia with all generosity… then comes a big change. Maybe it was some bad pizza during a break in the dictation of his letter, but Paul begins chapter 10 (and goes through chapter 12) with some strong words against false leaders among the church.

Paul was in a battle for the hearts and minds of the Corinthian saints. They were being misled and deceived by “strong” leaders who were eloquent speakers, but their Gospel was defective. Paul was being painted as an inferior apostle, in part because he was not a great speaker and because he did not have a strong charismatic presence. Paul was criticized as a physically ill-person who could not heal himself, and therefore how could he be a true Apostle. Paul spoke strong words in his letters, but in person he was not so bold to confront people. Paul’s detractors spun these facts to try and tear down Paul as a man of God.

Paul’s response attempted to refine the Corinthian’s thinking so they could clearly see the wisdom of God thorugh Paul and learn to discern right authority from wrong authority.  Here are the six elements to biblical authority I see in Paul’s writing of 2 Cor 10.

1. Right authority is not exclusive.

7 Look at the obvious fact. Those who say they belong to Christ must recognize that we belong to Christ as much as they do.

Paul never claimed to be “THE” only Apostle and those who are claiming to have exclusive authority over the church are liars.  Those pastors today who claim only they can hear the voice of God and only they alone can lead the local congregation do not speak with the authority of God.

2. Right authority builds up

8 I may seem to be boasting too much about the authority given to us by the Lord. But our authority builds you up; it doesn’t tear you down. So I will not be ashamed of using my authority.

If authority is from God, it will build up other leaders, not tear them down.  Biblical authority does not fear “competition” from other in the church, it encourages others to use their giftings and lead.

3. False Authority is built on “personal” accomplishment

12 Oh, don’t worry; we wouldn’t dare say that we are as wonderful as these other men who tell you how important they are! But they are only comparing themselves with each other, using themselves as the standard of measurement. How ignorant!

False authority is built on a resume of accomplishments.  The leader who holds out their worldly successes as a reason to trust their authority, they are not from God.

4. Right authority builds on “people” accomplishment.

13 We will not boast about things done outside our area of authority. We will boast only about what has happened within the boundaries of the work God has given us, which includes our working with you.

Notice the huge contrast Paul makes.  False leaders build authority on “personal” accomplishments, biblical leaders build authority on “people” accomplishments.  A false leader will point to how big their church is, how many degrees they have earned, and how many buildings they have built as their source of authority.  A good leader will point to the lives of those they have encouraged, strengthened, and healed as the demonstration of their calling and authority.

5. Right authority rejoices in the success of others.

15 Nor do we boast and claim credit for the work someone else has done. Instead, we hope that your faith will grow so that the boundaries of our work among you will be extended. 16 Then we will be able to go and preach the Good News in other places far beyond you, where no one else is working. Then there will be no question of our boasting about work done in someone else’s territory. 17 As the Scriptures say, “If you want to boast, boast only about the Lord.”

This is real simple, a good leader does not take the credit for the work of others.  A good leader rejoices in the success of others and builds up strong teams that can do great things.  Good leadership does not fear the authority and ministry of others.

6. Right authority comes from God

18 When people commend themselves, it doesn’t count for much. The important thing is for the Lord to commend them.

People cannot be their own reference in claiming leadership or authority.  Ultimately, according to Paul, right authority comes from a calling from God who establishes leaders for his mission.

  • Share/Bookmark
Advertisement

21 comments

  1. Brad Grasley says:

    Weird timing. I just preached on the topic of authority on Sunday. I like the way you broke this down!

  2. Lionel Woods says:

    Joe,

    What “authority” do leaders have in the local church that other believers do not have? Second, does the authority Paul and the other apostles have now transfer to elders (pastors) in the local church today? Or was this an exclusive authority because they understood that they were foundation layers for the church? Thanks Joe.

    • J.R. Miller says:

      Good questions.

      Let’s focus on one thing at a time though. This passage is directly about Paul and the Apostles. The Scripture teaches that Paul had the Authority of an Apostle, not everyone in the church shared that same authority.

      Do you deny his Apostolic authority given by Jesus (v.8)? If so, what is your biblical foundation?

      Do you think every Christian in the NT had the same Apostolic authority as Paul? If so, what is your biblical foundation? If everyone had the same authority as an Apostle, why did God give them the name Apostles?

  3. Lionel Woods says:

    Hey Joe,

    1. No

    2. No again

    I am sorry for the confusion. I was asking if leaders today, possess the same authority as Paul claims here. So I was speaking in the present tense. Sorry about the confusion again. Does this clarify my question more?

    • J.R. Miller says:

      Sure, I just wanted to move one step at a time to make sure we were not talking around one another.

      Here is my second question then, do you believe that God has established Elders for the church?

    • J.R. Miller says:

      Cool, so we are together so far since as you know, I do believe Elders are for the church today as they were for the church in the NT. :-)

      Now to the question of authority. First let me say that the goal, or demonstration, of right authority from an elder (or any leader) is exactly what Paul outlines above in defending his own authority?

      As to what Elders do, I only find two things that are unique to the leadership and authority of Elders.

      - The Elders mentor and appoint other Elders in younger congregations – Titus 1:5
      - The Elders rule well over the congregation – 1 Tim 5:17

      Can you show me any passage that says all Christians should appoint Elders?
      Can you show me any passage that says all Christians should rule well over the congregation?

      If not, then I would suggest that these are two areas of authority unique to Elders.

      PS
      Please see this post for the context to what I just wrote on the unique aspects of Eldership.

  4. Alan Knox says:

    Joe,

    There is no passage that say that “all Christians should appoint elders”. Also, there is no passage that says “Elders… appoint other Elders in younger congregations”. Paul does tell Titus to appoint elders, but Titus is never called an elder.

    1 Tim 5:17 tells us to consider elders who lead well and teach worthy of double honor. In 1 Thess 5:12-13, Paul also tells us to respect (honor?) those who work hard among us, lead us, and admonish us (elders and maybe others too?). Of course, he then tells all brothers (and sisters – masc plural includes feminine as well), to admonish one another (vs. 14). So, do we limit these Thess passages to only elders? Why?

    I would say that God has authority, and his word is authoritative since it comes from God. Anyone who teaches / lives / admonishes / etc. according to God’s word is doing so authoritatively, not based on their own authority, but based on God’s.

    -Alan

  5. Alan Knox says:

    In other words… I agree with your post. I don’t agree with your comment that elders have a unique authority.

    -Alan

    • J.R. Miller says:

      I know, but we will have to agree to disagree brother.

    • J.R. Miller says:

      Alan, quick question. Do you believe the Apostle’s had a unique authority in the church? Is so what? Is there anywhere you can find a specific list or outline of what the Apostle’s “job” was? If you have a post on this, feel free to give me a link too. Thanks.

      • Alan Knox says:

        I almost missed this reply. I believe the authors of Scripture held a unique authority because God was communicating his word through them.

        “Apostle” simple means representative, or ambassador, or “sent one”. Just as “Teacher” and “Evangelist” and “Prophet” tells us something about what these people did, I think “apostle” tells us something about what they did. I think the apostles had certain “rights” (exousia, sometimes translated “authority”) based on the fact that they were traveling (1 Cor 9 – and yes, I know you disagree with me about the focus of 1 Cor 9. :) )

        But, no, I do not know of a specific passage that details a job description for “apostle”. I’m not sure they would think of what they did as having a job description. They were called to go, so they went and did whatever they needed to do to proclaim the gospel and strengthen believers.

        -Alan

        • J.R. Miller says:

          So if Apostle just mean “ambassador” then is every Christian an Apostle? If yes, then why did Paul often defend his Apostolic authority. Why didn’t he just say, “hey, I am an Apostle and so is everyone.”?

          You wrote, “I believe the authors of Scripture held a unique authority because God was communicating his word through them.”
          Why? Based on what. If all are teacher, if all share the same authority, if all are apostles, what basis do you have to reserve this kind of authority for just one group of Christians. What is your proof of this statement?

          Thanks for helping me think through these things brother! :-)

          • Alan Knox says:

            Everyone is sent in the same sense that everyone teaches. But, that doesn’t mean everyone has the gift of apostleship or the gift of teaching.

            Based on the fact that they wrote Scripture.

            -Alan

          • Alan Knox says:

            As far as I know, there is no proof that the writings of the New Testament are actually God’s word.

            -Alan

  6. Lionel Woods says:

    Thaks for the comments Joe and Alan. This is something I am working through in a real way, so I am not trying to argue but really trying to understand some things. Typcially what I see is most elders/pastors quoting the authority of Paul as their own; however, I don’t see Paul giving over that authority, also the same with pay for elders, the first place people run in 1 Corinthians 9, but elders/pastors superimpose themselves on to that chapter when Paul is specifically talkign of apostles.

    Joe, I don’t see elders being apppointed by elders, even if so, who appoints that elder, who appointed them and then we get into the apostolic succession argument, so who appointed the first elder who began to appoint these other elders? This is not a trapping question, I just have to believe that it was the church who appointed one of these guys, unless a church can trace itself back to the apostolic age. Thanks.

    Alan, so who appoints elders then?

    • J.R. Miller says:

      Hi Lionel, good questions. These have been debated for hundreds of years and I think there are good arguments on both sides.

      Personally, I think it comes down to the idea that God has given his church liberty in may things so that we can rely on the Holy Spirit instead of legalism.

      I don’t make the argument, that Paul passes on Apostolic authority to the Elders. This passage is just showing how all authority can be judged as from men or from God.

      I think to ask, “what does the Elder do?” is a misdirected question though. The Scripture says that the Elders are to “rule well” but does not say, what that entails. It gives qualifications of Eldership, but not a list of “to-do” items. The reason, again, is that God gave his Holy Spirit to the church, not a list of “ten Elder-commandments”. So trying to say, “the scripture does not give a job description… therefore, the Elder has no authority, is IMHO, wrongheaded because it tries to answer the question of grace with law.

      So then, what is ruling well? I would point to the things Paul says above in my post as a good answer–the only authority Elders have is the authority used within the conditions outlined by Paul. The Scripture does not give a list of what the Elder does (that is legalism). What God is concerned with is his mission (to make more and better disciples) and his method (rule is loving-service). Unless you can point out a passage that says differently, I would suggest to you that ANYTHING and EVERYTHING an Elder does for his church within these guidelines is biblical leadership!

      Also Lionel and Alan, I may be using the term “leader” differently than you suspect. I believe that leadership in the church is a mark of Christian maturity. It is not a word limited to Apostles or Elders in that all mature Christians should be leaders in the church… each has a unique role, but leadership, authority, and order is an integral part of NT church. Leadership is not a job description, it is a characteristic of maturity in Faith.

      To get the right context, please read this post titled, “Too Many Leaders?

  7. Alan Knox says:

    Joe,

    I wish we lived closer so that we could disagree together over a cup of coffee instead of disagreeing over the internet.

    Lionel,

    I believe the Holy Spirit appoints elders (as per Acts 20:28). Thus, the church’s responsibility is to recognize who the Holy Spirit has appointed. What we read in Scripture (in my opinion) is the church (including Paul, Barnabas, Timothy, Titus, et.al.) attempting to recognize who the Holy Spirit appointed as elders.

    -Alan

  8. Alan Knox says:

    Joe,

    You’re correct. I’m using the terms that you’re translating as “rule” (priostime) and “lead” (egeomai) as synonyms when directed towards Christians. I think they are both covered in Jesus’ instructions that no believers is to rule over any other, but is instead to be servants of all.

    -Alan

  9. don harris says:

    Author’s comment was posted in error and was reposted in the correct thread.

Leave a Reply