Opening Thoughts
A powerful 7.0 earthquake hit haiti this past week and killed at least 72,000. Countless people are starving and more will eventually die from diseases spawned from the unburied corpses filling the streets of Port-au-Prince. I feel a connection with the people of Haiti. My parents served there in the 1980′s doing both medical and building missions and they saw first hand the destructive rule of Bébé Doc Duvalier. Over the years, our family sponsored several needy kids from Haiti and I grew up reading letters from our sponsored children telling of their life in Haiti. In last week’s earthquake, my wife agonized in prayer for many days over the life of an APU friend who was missing, and eventually found alive, in the rubble of the Hotel Montana. With my own history in mind, I want to address this earthquake and how I see God’s judgment and love at work.
God’s Judgement Today
The internet is abuzz with the infamous remarks made by Pat Robertson on on the 700 Club TV show.
Something happened a long time ago in Haiti, and people might not want to talk about it. They were under the heel of the French. You know, Napoleon III and whatever. And they got together and swore a pact to the devil. They said, ‘We will serve you if you will get us free from the French.’ True story. And so, the devil said, ‘OK, it’s a deal. And they kicked the French out. You know, the Haitians revolted and got themselves free. But ever since, they have been cursed by one thing after the other. Desperately poor. That island of Hispaniola is one island. It’s cut down the middle. On the one side is Haiti; on the other side is the Dominican Republic. Dominican Republic is prosperous, healthy, full of resorts, et cetera. Haiti is in desperate poverty. Same island. They need to have — and we need to pray for them — a great turning to God. And out of this tragedy, I’m optimistic something good may come. But right now, we’re helping the suffering people, and the suffering is unimaginable.
Most disturbing is the historical falsity presented as “fact” from a guy who founded a University. Napoleon III did not come into power in France until 44 years after the Haitian revolt. If Robertson can’t get his history correct on such a simple thing, I don’t trust him in more complex matters. So on its face Robertson’s “true story” must be called into serious question.
The primary problem with this quote, however, is Robertson’s biblical hermeneutic and application which I have repeatedly called into question. In this particular instance, I would like to distance myself from Robertson’s assertion that natural disasters are the judgment of God. I disagree with Robertson’s view for one simple reason; we are not in an age of Natural Judgement but an age of judgment through grace.
YHWH has not changed–He is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow. God has appointed differing ages of judgment in order to establish his unchanging plan of salvation. In other words, God’s method of judgement upon the world is different today than it was in the Old Testament, and different from the Age to come, but his overall purpose is the same–redemption of the lost.
First, unlike some other Christian commentators, I do not have a moral or ethical problem with God judging nations by the sword or natural disaster. Clearly God did this during the Old Testament period where He punished whole nations for the sins of their Kings and leaders (Isa 1:1-20; Jer 5:15-17; Lam 2:1-22). I don’t claim to understand it, I even cringe at it, but I trust that God’s judgement upon these nations in the Old Testament were fair and designed to serve YHWH’s purpose.
Second, God will some future day judge the nations for their actions. The Old Testament is clear in teaching that in the “Day of the Lord” (an End of Times judgement) God will hold to account all the nations of the world for their wicked deeds.
For the day of the LORD is near upon all the nations.
As you have done, it shall be done to you;
your deeds shall return on your own head (Obediah 15. ESV)
Third, the world today exists in the age of Christ’s Judgement of Grace. God has, for a season, forestalled the judgement of sword and nature upon the nations so they might instead have an opportunity to respond to the judgement of Christ expressed in his unselfish act of love on the Cross.
“[Jesus says] Now my heart is troubled, and what shall I say? ‘Father, save me from this hour’? No, it was for this very reason I came to this hour. Father, glorify your name!”
Then a voice came from heaven, “I have glorified it, and will glorify it again.” The crowd that was there and heard it said it had thundered; others said an angel had spoken to him.
Jesus said, “This voice was for your benefit, not mine. Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out. But I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself.” He said this to show the kind of death he was going to die.
The crowd spoke up, “We have heard from the Law that the Christ will remain forever, so how can you say, ‘The Son of Man must be lifted up’? Who is this ‘Son of Man’?”
Then Jesus told them, “You are going to have the light just a little while longer. Walk while you have the light, before darkness overtakes you. The man who walks in the dark does not know where he is going. Put your trust in the light while you have it, so that you may become sons of light. (John 12:27-36)”
God’s judgement today is not with sword and quake–used to drive the sinful to their knees in fear–it is in the death of Christ lifted up on the Cross–used to drive the sinful to their knees in love. Through Jesus’ act of love for the world, God is judging the nations who refuse to accept Jesus as the light of life.
Finally, how then should we perceive natural disasters if they are not a judgment of God?
- Natural disasters are a manifestation of corruption brought upon God’s creation through the sin of Adam (Genesis 3:1-24).
- Natural disasters are the manifestation of Nature’s true longing to be freed from the shackles of sin’s corruption (Romans 8:18-25).
Application for Haiti
Haiti has suffered from a tremendous disaster, but the death and suffering are not a result of God’s judgment and I would argue that they are not even the result of the earthquake. The death and destruction in haiti is the result of the sinful leaders of that nation who have kept those people in poverty and allowed the earthquake to bring destruction.
1. The death and suffering in Haiti is a direct result of greed.
Since 1992, the United States has given 3 Billion dollars in aid to Haiti, yet it remains the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere. The money was stolen by Haiti’s leaders and the more money the US poured in, the worse things got for Haiti. The poor have no escape from Haiti because the money given to them was stolen by evil men.
2. The death and suffering in Haiti is a direct result of their value system.
In 1989, a 7.0 earthquake hit San Francisco (not exactly the picture of moral virtue), yet in that quake only 57 people were killed. Why? Because the leaders in the US, although sinful, still value the life of its citizenry. Based on our values, we impose building codes and invest Billions in infrastructures designed to protect the poor and wealthy alike from earthquakes. Haiti’s leaders do not value life, so instead of spending money on infrastructure, they continued their policies of poverty.
3. The death and suffering of Haiti is a direct result of their religious faith.
Haiti’s predominant faith is Voodoo–a belief that magic and the spirits will save them from disaster. Tony Campolo remarks on this very thing in his recent response to the earthquake.
Haiti’s former dictator, Jean-Claude Duvalier, was a voodoo witchdoctor, and when he was driven from power it was widely rumored that he offered an infant boy as a blood sacrifice to Satan, and cursed the country with an evil spell to bring disasters and suffering upon the Haitian people. You may not believe in that sort of thing, but many Haitians do. Now we must show them that God’s love, expressed through sacrificial people, is greater than the forces of darkness.
The Haitian people are ruled by evil spirits. They allow politicians to rule who share their same faith and fears–leaders who seek power through evil forces. The curse of Duvalier may not have “caused” the earthquake, but it does remind us that the faith of a nation can enslave a people to poverty resulting the due penalty of their sin.
Ultimately, the hope for Haiti is that they see the light of Christ’s judgment of grace on the cross and turn to Him for freedom. Haiti will only find this freedom in the giving of love–not dollars. Love is expressed not through the giving of Billions, but through the message of the Gospel and the sacrifice of the many Christians who have given up the Western lifestyle to become the hands and feet of of Jesus to the people.




” Haiti will only find this freedom in the giving of love–not dollars.”
I’m so glad to see you write this. I’ve been feeling this from the first time I’ve heard of the tragedy and haven’t been able to express it as well as you have here.
You may have to excuse my lack of knowledge in this area, but I wonder how does your conclusion that we live in an age of God’s grace fit into an account like Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5. It seems God’s judgment came upon them.
Great question Kyle. This post is dealing with how God judges the world at large.
A second, and separate issue, is how God works among the Saints. Acts 5 then is a specific issue of judgement among the Saints and not the same what is being addressed in the post. You can listen to my sermon on Acts 5 entitled, “Transparent Community” as this might better answer your question.
Thanks.
Will give the sermon a listen
“Haiti’s predominant faith is Voodoo–a belief that magic and the spirits will save them from disaster. ”
About 90% of Haitians claim to be Christian.
The predominant faith is Roman Catholicism at 80-85%. 10-15% are Protestants. About 50% also practice Voodoo alongside their Christianity.
Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Haiti#Religion
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ha.html
Yes Cliff, much of the population that claims to be “Christian: has a syncretistic faith that mixes Catholicism and witchcraft.. thus the term Voodoo reflects the meshing of these two religions.
BTW Cliff, you cited a Wiki article that has no authoritative citations so you really should be more careful where you get your stats.
The world factbook you linked to has only a single “note” that simply says, “roughly half of the population practices voodoo”
Christianity cannot coexist with witchcraft, therefore if you run the numbers the predominant religion is Voodoo.
“Haiti’s former dictator, Jean-Claude Duvalier, was a voodoo witchdoctor, and when he was driven from power it was widely rumored that he offered an infant boy as a blood sacrifice to Satan, and cursed the country with an evil spell to bring disasters and suffering upon the Haitian people.” ~ Tony Campolo
—
I think this story might just be a rumor.
So what is your point Cliff?
Well – you started your post out with a great rebuttal of Pat Robertson and his use of falsity in regards to his reference to a rumor that the Haitians made a pact with the devil and other historical facts. But then you ended your post with a positive use and reference to Tony Campolo where he is doing essentially the exact same thing as Pat Robertson – spreading a rumor. I understand Tony Campolo used this rumor for shock value – but I don’t think it was needed to make his (or your point) and if it’s not true then how is it any different then Pat Robertson?
Sure Cliff, I see why you are confused. I debated the inclusion of Campolo’s story, but included it because I think it provides the correct context to the poverty of Haiti.
First, you need to understand that Robertson is talking about something different from Campolo. They stories are not related to one another.
Second, Robertson is presenting his story as historical fact and suggesting this “pact with the devil” is the cause of the earthquake. Campolo is relating this second story not as an historical “fact” but as something many Haitians believe happened. The purpose in Campolo’s story in my post is not to to affirm the veracity of the myth. Unlike Robertson, the story is not retold in an effort to connect Hatian Voodoo directly to the earthquake. Now this is important Cliff and you are missing it. I retell this Baby Doc myth as it has direct meaning to the Haitian bondage to poverty and bad leaders. Many Haitians feared Baby Doc’s Voodoo powers and they were afraid to fight against him because he might curse them. Their Voodoo fears allowed evil men to rule and that is important for understanding why the earthquake had such a devastating impact.
In short Cliff, they are 2 different stories told for 2 different purposes. They are not told, as you wrongly conclude for “essentially” the same thing. You are connecting them on a surface level and not reading the substance with understanding.
I also don’t think Campolo is trying for “shock” value as you suggest. Your conclusion takes his story (and my use of it) out of context.
Please reread the post Cliff and try hard to understand these significant differences.
Thanks for clarifying. Tony Campolo’s odd phrasing of that paragraph combined with you immediately stating “The Haitian people are ruled by evil spirits. ” after the paragraph was confusing – it made it sound like this was being presented as fact – which is why I posted I think it’s just a rumor. I think that whole last Point 3 seems to be what’s confusing about your post. (i.e. Lionel Woods comment below.) It helps you’ve clarified everything. Thanks – good post.
AMEN!! Joe! I was going to ask you your thoughts on his comments…I couldn’t believe he would, once again, speak before he speaks.
I don’t believe “nations” have faith as we see in the Old Testament. As now there are many of Christians who live faithfully to and for God and you beleive God also “judged” them?
I guess that is where my struggle is. Unlike Edom who wholly rejected God, many Hatians are Christians. Also I believe that the sins of the father will no longer be on the sons, as Christ said “I came to bring a sword not peace”. So if God would spare Sodom and Gomorrah if there were 10 righteous would He not spare Haiti with 100′s of thousands that are righteous? Or am I misundestanding you?
Yes, you have completely misunderstood the post because the whole point of my post is that God did not judge Haiti with an earthquake… you don’t get that from my post? I wrote it in at least 3 places.
Sorry, I think the last paragraph was confusing. I did get that at first but then your last paragraph and points sort of sounded like you meant He did. Sorry again brother. I think the “Christ’s Judgment” comment confused me.
Fair enough. I modified the first sentance of the last paragraph from this
Ultimately, the hope for Haiti is that they see the light of Christ’s judgment and turn to Him for freedom.
to this (see words in bold)
Ultimately, the hope for Haiti is that they see the light of Christ’s judgment of grace on the cross and turn to Him for freedom.
PS
Reread the passage from John 12 quoting Jesus for why I chose the terminology I did.
How apt that “in the beginning,” at the close of creation, “God saw that it was good.” [Gen_1:25] All the creatures of the sea, sky and land lived harmoniously. Then God created Man and gave him instructions to multiply and replenish the earth and gave him dominion over it. And, God said everything was “very good.” [Gen_1:31] So, we went from “good” to “very “good” – - then how did this world become not so very good today?
Most of us know the creation story: “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” [Gen_1:1] Most of us center our interest on the part about man’s beginnings and the earth – - not so many of us know the story of heaven. Especially the story of God’s creating a heavenly realm filled with angelic creatures who worked there. Specifically few spend little study on the creation of the “anointed cherub that covereth” named Lucifer. As his name implies, he was God’s “light bearer.” [Eze_28:11-19] Ezekiel tells us Lucifer sat on the holy mountain of God and was perfect in all his ways. He was the highest ranking angelic being in all of heaven – - till iniquity was found in him. The iniquity was Lucifer’s desire to become “like the most high God” [Isa_14:12-14] He wanted God’s job. He became an adversary of God. (The Hebrew word for adversary is “Satan.” Lucifer is Satan.)
Lucifer was not created to be satanic nor to be princely – - he chose to disassociate himself with God. If Lucifer is to be “like the most High” he must secure a substantial claim and right to exercise his authority in the realms created in Gen 1:1: heaven and earth. And, he must recruit others to assist him. Scripture acknowledges he did just that because he’s given the titles of both “prince of the power of the air” [Eph_2:2] and “the prince of the world” [Joh_14:30] As Prince he exercises authority over his subjects in those realms. He successfully recruited (some say) a third of the angelic host to jump ship with him. With these invisible inhabitants of heaven as subjects, Lucifer attained power in the air. Now he must do the same thing on the earth.
I did a lengthy introduction to show why Satan, in his quest to be “like the most High,” became prince of the invisible realm and must now become prince of this world. We know in the beginning creation was “very good” and Adam (created in the image of God) was given dominion over the earth. For Satan to accomplish the second phase of his plan he needs to usurp Adam’s reign. He must cause Adam to rebel against God’s wishes and, having deceived him to do so, by default, he abdicates his role as monarch. We find that deception played out in Genesis 3. Even unbelievers know the story of the Fall: Snake, Eve, Adam, forbidden fruit, exile from the Garden. But few know that was how Satan become the god of this world. The result of the Fall was all that God called very good — is not; all that Adam’s realm had in good order — is not; man’s relationship with God was in harmony is now in dischord. The Earth is in shambles – - chaos, sin, misery, illness, death and turmoil rule.
What we’ve seen happening around the world, in our nation, state, towns and homes is not from God but from Lucifer, the “prince of the world.” And it is he who relishes the rants of ignorant people who blame God for such disastrous events. Shame on the religious of the world, who in their churches, TV broadcasts, printed media perpetuate the lie (from the father of lies) blaming the Creator of all good things.
Wally, good comment. I remember you mentioned this briefly a couple Sundays ago. Thanks for expanding on this here. I have a question for you. How do you understand Jesus’ statement I quoted in John 12 “Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out. But I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself.” in light of Satan being the god of this world?
A quick reply (since I am playing with the grand kids in Texas) Christ’s coming into Jerusalem was to have been the culmination of Daniel’s 70 week prophecy. The judgment . . the time of Jacob’s Trouble . . the Tribulation [pick one - lol] was to follow the 2nd coming of Christ – - the gathering of the Little Flock [Righteous Nation] and the Leaders of Israel accepting the Lord Jesus as Messiah. Paul tells us they stumbled at the cross, Israel fell, became Loammi, and Paul was sent to the gentiles. Israel’s program was set aside. Paul’s dispensation of the grace of God is a parenthetical age which will be over when the times of the gentiles is come in . . . then the program for Israel will once again be reinstated and the judgment of John 12 will occur.
Kudos!
Apparently, one word comments are not allowed. Hopefully this addendum will satisfy the length requirements
Good posting, glad to see a level headed approach to what’s happening in Haiti from a Christian viewpoint.
Just had a discussion with a brother who exactly said the same thing – God’s judgement on Haiti.
Question is, why stop there, He should have come all the way up to North America, if that is the rational.