Archive for the ‘Book Reviews’ category

Book Giveaway Winner

May 28th, 2010

David B. of VA has won the giveaway for “An Army of Ordinary People”.

It looks like his post plus the extra entry from tweeting a link paid off!

Congrats David!  You will have to post some of your own thoughts once you read the book.

Thanks again to Tyndale House Publishing for providing the book and thank you Felicity for writing it!

And thanks for everyone who entered via post, tweet or email!  Sorry you could not all win, but maybe next time!

  • Share/Bookmark

FREE BOOK GIVEAWAY: “An Army of Ordinary People”

May 19th, 2010

- Leave a comment or email me to enter the drawing and get your chance to win a free copy of the book -

- Tweet a link to this post, and earn a second entry in the drawing -


Almost 1 year ago, I reviewed the book “The Rabbit and the Elephant.” Felicity Dale has written another book and Tyndale House Publishers asked me if I would again review this book.  Since the book fits in with so much of what I blog about, I agreed.  ”An Army of Ordinary People” shares the story of church using narrative, so in sticking with that theme, I decided to share this Q&A with the author, Felicity Dale.

Interview

Question: What is the main message that An Army of Ordinary People seeks to communicate?

Felicity: All around the world, God is giving His people a vision of church that is simpler—a group of friends gathered around a meal table, a vibrant community of Jesus followers reaching out to the world around them. These groups are known as simple, organic or house churches and in many nations, movements of these churches are seeing explosive growth because of new believers. This book explores the main principles involved in these movements using examples from here in the West.

Question: An Army of Ordinary People is essentially a book of stories. Why did you choose this way to communicate?

Felicity: Stories are powerful. Jesus used them all the time to communicate truths to his followers. There’s a saying: “The longest journey a man must take is the eighteen inches from his head to his heart.” A person may be convinced intellectually, but that doesn’t necessarily translate into action. The reverse journey from the heart to the head is way shorter. If you can capture a person’s heart, their belief system catches up very quickly. Stories tug at our hearts and are more likely to produce change.

A generation is rising up for whom stories are a vital way to communicate. They often read little, and for them, books are only associated with academic learning. If you ask them what they remember from a talk, they are more likely to remember the illustrations than the theory. I know people who would never read a theoretical book on church planting, but have read Army in a few short days.

The principle that each story illustrates is explored more fully at the end of each chapter.

Question: What other important principles come out in the book?

Felicity: I describe the story of two men who started a prayer movement—any move of God has to be bathed in prayer; I look at Sam, who most people would have written off, but who reaches out to the marginalized of society. I explore the transition process using the journey of a traditional church pastor who discovers simple church. The story of Elizabeth shows the importance of reaching out into the community rather than asking others to come to our church. Other chapters look at what you do when you come together, and how to meet under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

Question: Tell me about the process of writing the book?

Felicity: My husband, Tony, and I have been involved in simple/organic churches in this country since the mid 1990s, and before that in similar groups in the U.K. In 2000, two couples approached us and asked if we would consider helping them start a magazine for the house church movement. We agreed, and House2House (www.house2house.com) was born. People frequently contacted H2H with questions, and rather than trying to answer each person individually, I decided to produce a written work exploring the principles of simple/organic church. This developed into a manual that has been used all over the world.

The stories in An Army of Ordinary People embody the principles in the manual. Once I had decided whose stories to use, I spent a long time, often several hours, interviewing each person. I transcribed each interview and then wrote the story.

So the book is really a “how-to” guide on discipleship and simple/organic churches but using stories as the primary means to communicate this, followed by an exploration of the principles involved. Most of the stories are about ordinary people, not spiritual superstars, whom God has used, often in remarkable ways. The hope is that anyone reading the book would be able to identify with one of the stories and say, “I could do that!”

Question: This is the second version of the book to come out. How did the Lord use the original version?

Felicity: Tony and I self published the first version. (We did have an offer from a major publisher who offered us “fame and fortune” for the original manuscript, but that seemed so contrary to the principles of simple/organic church that we turned them down!) I am very grateful that this updated version is being published by Tyndale House Publishers within the Barna imprint. Tyndale has been a pleasure to work with, and of course, George (Barna) adds huge credibility. I deeply appreciate his integrity and input.

I am always humbled when I hear of how God uses anything I’ve written. I’ve heard of mega churches, simple/organic churches and, of course, individuals who used the older version of Army to think through the principles of simple/organic church and learn how to work more effectively with communities of not-yet-believers. Other churches have used it to revitalize their small groups and make them more missional. Army was written for ordinary people (rather than theologians or trained professionals) who want to follow the Lord into the harvest.

Question: When you went back to everyone to update the book five years after originally writing their stories, what did you find?

Felicity: To be honest, I approached this with some trepidation. Would it invalidate what I had written if everything I described in the original book had imploded? But I found that all but one or two of the people whose stories I told were still pressing on with the simple church journey. God is continuing to use them. Where relevant, I’ve included updates on their stories in the new version.

Question: How typical are the stories you have written?

Felicity: I could take you to literally dozens of stories that illustrate each of the principles I describe in Army. Our other book, The Rabbit and the Elephant has a number of these stories in it.

Question: You originally wrote this book in 2005. What has happened to the house church movement in the United States since then?

Felicity: Amazing growth! According to research done by George Barna (who has written the foreword to the new book), there are now around 11 million people in this country involved in simple/house churches. Obviously many of these people originally went to a more traditional form of church (what we like to call a legacy church), but one of the most encouraging things we are currently seeing is the number of these churches that are multiplying through new believers.

Question: What do you see for the future?

Felicity: Jesus is building His church, a beautiful bride. Organic/house church is part of the journey, but we are kidding ourselves if we think this is the only thing God is doing. I also see other important issues developing momentum within the movement—for example, an emphasis on the Kingdom of God, another on the role of women within the Kingdom. But what a privilege to be involved in the Kingdom at such a time as this! We’re no longer sitting wistfully on the sidelines watching God move elsewhere in the world. He’s working here too! And house/simple church is one of the things He is doing.

The Giveaway

If this book sounds like a good read, leave a comment or email me and I will do a drawing for the winner.  You have until Monday May 24th to post a comment and enter the drawing.  If I get enough comments, I may just be willing to give away 2 copies of the book :-)

Also, tweet a link to this post, and earn a second entry in the drawing.

  • Share/Bookmark

REVIEW: “Corinthian Elders”

May 10th, 2010

Review

"Corinthian Elders" by Jack Fortenberry

Jack Fortenberry is the author of a short essay entitled, “Corinthian Elders”.   His book was published in 2008 and Fortenberry recently emailed me and asked if I would read his book and review it for my readers.

The premise of Fortenberry’s book is that leaders in the Church can harm, not help, our relationship with Christ and hinder the Church’s ability to make disciples. Fortenberry supports this thesis by citing Paul’s admonition in 1 Cor 1-4 to not follow after a gifted speaker, but instead on the wisdom of Christ given to each follower through the Holy Spirit (17). Fortemberry writes:

For the church to present one or a few preachers to a passive audience who attend services because they enjoy the sermon or preaching style is a violation of Paul’s commandment to the Church.  Do we know better than Paul? (15)… Giftedness, as some consider oratory skills in professional preachers, may in fact be detrimental to a demonstration of the Spirit’s working as indicated by Paul in 1 Corinthians 2:4… (23)

Fortenberry’s main concern is that the system of hiring professional speakers or Elders encourages people to follow after “favorite” speakers instead of the leadership of the Spirit among the saints (32-33) .

Fortenberry’s book goes on to say that consensus leadership is the New Testament model of how the church should be governed (46).  Additionally, he concludes, that no Elder should ever receive any money in support of their ministry to the flock (55-56).

Summary

I have some points of disagreement on the topics of giving financial support to Elders (read more),  and I would like to read a more thorough treatment from Fortenberry on how he is using the term “leader” (read more).   Overall, “Corinthian Elders” is a good contribution to the ongoing reformation of the church in the West and the emphasis on following Christ and allowing the Holy Spirit to teach us is a much needed reminder to the church at large.

  • Share/Bookmark

REVIEW: “The Community Life of God”

April 27th, 2010

Introduction

Milt Rodriguez is the author of “The Community Life of God.”  Rodriguez contacted me some time ago to asked if I would review his book.  I was intrigued by the topic of the book and agreed to post my thoughts.

Rodriguez is involved in the Organic Church movement and his book is endorsed by author Frank Viola and house church advocate Jon Zens.  ”The Community Life of God” attempts to lay both a practical and theological foundation for the Trinity as the model of all relationships.

What Works

The strength of this book is Rodriguez’s emphasis on the practical need within the church to build deep relationships.  Rodriguez writes, “Building  cannot happen with stones who occasionally and casually meet together (106).”  Community life only happens when there is a deep investment and willingness to sacrifice for others.  Rodriguez argues that as the Trinity works in concert, so too each member of the church must eschew individualism and work together to fulfill the purpose of God (130).

David Flowers has a good summary of what works well in this book.  Flowers writes,

Rodriguez proposes that much of Christian activity today is spent furthering the individualistic mindset that is so popular in our culture. Even when believers come together corporately there is not an understanding of God’s image among us. Church life ought to be more than socializing and individual Christian ministries.

On this point I think every Christian can agree and aspire.

What Needs Work

The book started off a bit rough for me.  The introductory chapter has some awkwardly worded paragraphs that are more confusing than helpful.  For example, the following paragraph is supposed to define God’s purpose in the creation of man.

Why did God create?  What was the motivational factor in the creation?  I think that we can safely say the He created in order to put His plan into action; to take the first step toward fulfilling His purpose.  You see, there is the purpose, but then there is His plan to fulfill the purpose.  The purpose is His goal.  The plan is the way to achieve that goal. The apostle Paul speaks of this “plan” in his letter to the Ephesians.

“Why did God create?”  This paragraph does not help answer the question and quite honestly the entire introduction to the books is more frustrating than insightful.

At times, Rodriguez tries to lecture the reader.  He writes,

Now please pay attention very carefully.

When you just read my quotation of that verse in Colossians you immediately took that verse and applied it to you as an individual (49).

Stylistically, it is a bit off-putting when a writer lectures the reader about what they think or feel. Some readers may not mind this approach, but for me it created a barrier.  Writing style aside, the bigger issue is Rodriguez’s theology.

In Rodriguez’s effort to counter the individualistic church culture, he tends to overstate his case.  In this example, Rodriguez asserts that anyone who says they are, as an individual, made in the image of Christ is repeating a lie of Satan.

Yet I hear believers talking all the time about being “like Jesus”or being “like Christ.”  Yet the scriptures do not ever teach that you, as an individual, can be like Christ.  That again, is the delusion of the ole’ serpant.  You cannot be like Jesus.  You were never meant to be like Jesus (52).

While I agree with Rodriguez that community is key to being conformed to the image of Christ, this in no way precludes the meaning for the individual disciple.

The most disconcerting aspect of Rodriguez’s theology is his bent toward “Open Theism”    That is, Rodriguez takes the “community” of God’s being  as analogous to the “community” of humanity (see Smith, Fred, “Does Classical Theism Deny God’s Immanence?” vol. 160, Bibliotheca Sacra Volume 160, 637 (Dallas, TX: Dallas Theological Seminary, 2003), 22-24.).  Here is a sampling of quotes where Rodriguez’s theology should be critically examined.

“From God’s perspective, Christ is no longer a single person. He is a corporate person, Christ and the Church are a single reality (87).” Quoting Frank Viola’s book, “From Here to Eternity”

“The Man is a new creation, a new species.  He is made up of both God and Man.  He is composed of both divinity and humanity.  God and man have been merged together as one in Christ (88).

“Who is in charge [of the church]?”  Christ is in charge.  A Christ who is made up of both the Head and the Body.  The One New Man(141).”

Ultimately, Rodriguez’s book blurs important distinction between the Creator and the Created.. and key difference between Christ and the Church.

Summary

There is no need, nor any biblical root, for connecting the essential “community-life” of Church with the “community-life” of the Trinity.  There is a significant amount of Scripture that teaches the necessity of community that stands on its own without reading into it a philosophical paradigm that recreates God in the image of humanity.  We, as the Church, can achieve a practical community life without the kind of “creative” theology embraced in “The Community Life of God.

 

  • Share/Bookmark