Archive for the ‘Politics’ category

The Rise of Freedom and the Demise of Grace

July 4th, 2010

On the 4th of July, churches all across the United States of America will celebrate Freedom!  Unfortunately, it is hard to differentiate the religious from the political rhetoric when it comes to this topic.  The typical Evangelical Sunday-fare goes something like this, “God made us to be free… America is freedom… America is God’s country… Oh, and Jesus wants us to be free from sin…”  That about covers it, except some churches skip the part about Jesus and opt for a congregational sing—along  of “America the Beautiful.”

The problem is that “freedom” has shifted the focus of our Faith celebration away from grace.

Francis Schaeffer traces the roots of this philosophical shift during the late 18th and 19th centuries… a critical time in the founding of our nation.

After the Renaissance-Reformation period the next crucial stage was reached at the time of Rousseau (1712-78) and of Kant (1724-1804), although there were of course many others in the intervening period who could well be studied.

By the time we come to Kant and Rousseau, the sense of the autonomous is fully developed. So we find now that the problem was formulated differently. This shift in the wording of the formulation shows, by itself, the development of the problem. Whereas previously men had spoken of nature and grace, by the eighteenth century there was no idea of grace — the word did not fit any longer. Rationalism was now well-developed and entrenched, and there was no concept of revelation in any area. Consequently the problem was now defined, not in terms of “nature and grace,” but of “nature and freedom”

This is a titanic change, expressing a secularized situation. Nature has totally devoured grace, and what is left in its place “upstairs” is the word “freedom.”…

In the above diagram, freedom and nature are both now autonomous. The individual’s freedom is seen not only as freedom without the need of redemption, but as absolute freedom.

The fight to retain freedom is carried on by Rousseau to an extreme. He and those who follow him express in their literature and art a casting aside of civilization as that which is restraining man’s freedom. This is the birth of the Bohemian ideal. These thinkers feel the pressure “downstairs” of man as a machine. Naturalistic science becomes a very heavy weight — an enemy. Freedom is beginning to be lost. So these men, who are not really modem men as yet — and so have not accepted the fact that they are only machines — begin to hate science. They long for freedom even if the freedom makes no sense, and thus autonomous freedom and the autonomous machine stand facing each other.

Francis A. Schaeffer, The Complete Works of Francis A. Schaeffer : A Christian Worldview. (Westchester, Ill.: Crossway Books, 1996).

This concept of absolute Freedom for the individual (and nation) shaped America’s Founders and sowed the seeds for the American Revolution. The desire for unbridled  Freedom undergirds our modern American culture and, in the Church at large, has replaced any meaningful belief in the superseding power of Divine-grace. Few churches offer ‘more than cake’ when it comes to teaching the fundamental difference between America’s version of Freedom and YHWH’s Grace.  We have allowed the culture to idealize Freedom and instead of offering God’s alternative of Grace, the Church has simply chosen to offer a spiritualized freedom (Freedom + jesus).

The masses long for Freedom, yet economic chaos and global war have proven politicians to be false prophets of a false hope.  The church is in decline because She has compromised grace and offers nothing more significant than Jesus eating apple pie and saluting the Red White and Blue.  The Church has unwittingly fostered the rise of freedom and demise of grace.

This 4th of July, my prayer is that we, the people of God, set aside our dalliance with Freedom and return to our love of Grace.

  • Share/Bookmark

Pro-Abortion Supporters are Proven Fools

February 7th, 2010

So leading up to the Super Bowl, I could not escape the anger and outrage expressed by Pro-Choice groups over the Tim Tebow ad.  The Pro-Abortion crowd, without ever seeing the ad, made dumb statements like this.

Terry O’Neill, the president of the National Organization for Women, said she had respect for the private choices made by women such as Pam Tebow but condemned the planned ad as “extraordinarily offensive and demeaning.”

“That’s not being respectful of other people’s lives,” O’Neill said. “It is offensive to hold one way out as being a superior way over everybody else’s.”

And even dumber stuff like this

“This organization is extremely intolerant and divisive and pushing an un-American agenda,” said Jehmu Greene, director of the Women’s Media Center, which is coordinating a campaign to force CBS to pull the ad before it airs on Feb. 7.

“Abortion is very controversial, and the anti-abortion vitriol has resulted in escalated violence against reproductive health providers and their patients,” Greene said. “We’ve seen that clearly with the murder of Dr. George Tiller,” the late-term abortion provider who was gunned down in his Kansas church in May 2009.

So what was this highly “divisive” add that was anti-American and will lead to the killing of doctors? See for yourself and you decide.

It seems to me the only divisive and ignorant people in this discussion are the pro-abortion woman’s groups that are not even smart enough to watch an Ad before they oppose it.

PS

Please watch more of the Tebow family story by clicking here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Democracy is not Freedom

January 2nd, 2010

For the law of the Spirit of life has set you free in Christ Jesus from the law of sin and death. For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do. – Rom. 8:2-4 (ESV)

We in America like to think our Freedom, and the hope of our world to be free, will be achieved because we are a nation of laws. We like to think that our Democracy serves the cause of Freedom, but it does not. All Governments exists to limit our freedom, because left to our own passions society will always degenerate.

Freedom can only exist when there is an absolute unchanging moral standard and a mean by which that standard can be achieved.

In the Old Testament of the Bible we read how a perfect Law  was given by YHWH.   And while this perfect moral standard pointed the Jews toward what was right, the Law had no power to help them achieve it.
A Nation of Laws, like America, points not to what is right, but to what is socially acceptable, and then the Government relies upon the threat of violence to bring conformity.
Only through Jesus Christ do we find both rightness and power.   The Son points us to what it always right and has the power of life through the Holy Spirit as the means to transform us.

Some will argue, “I have the power within me.  If I set my mind to it, I can achieve my own freedom.”  The futility of this approach is evident in the myriad of “self-help” books that fill up countless shelves in the local bookstore. If any of them actually worked, we would not need new books every year with new self-help gurus to promote their new “methods”.

Freedom in the Son is achieved by setting us from from the rat-race of human competition. It frees us from World’s goal of personal achievement. It frees us from the competition against our own self-destructive tendencies.  Total freedom is found only in the Son because he offers more than a program of “visualization” and “self-actualization”, he offers relationship!

  • Share/Bookmark

The Manhattan Declaration-A Call to Conscience or Compromise?

November 25th, 2009

Screen shot 2009-11-25 at 12.39.57 PMThe Manhattan Declaration is a formal “call to arms” to all Christians asking us to engage in the major issues that are shaping our modern society. Following is the summary of this declaration.

Christians, when they have lived up to the highest ideals of their faith, have defended the weak and vulnerable and worked tirelessly to protect and strengthen vital institutions of civil society, beginning with the family.

We are Orthodox, Catholic, and evangelical Christians who have united at this hour to reaffirm fundamental truths about justice and the common good, and to call upon our fellow citizens, believers and non-believers alike, to join us in defending them. These truths are (1) the sanctity of human life, (2) the dignity of marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife, and (3) the rights of conscience and religious liberty. Inasmuch as these truths are foundational to human dignity and the well-being of society, they are inviolable and non-negotiable. Because they are increasingly under assault from powerful forces in our culture, we are compelled today to speak out forcefully in their defense, and to commit ourselves to honoring them fully no matter what pressures are brought upon us and our institutions to abandon or compromise them. We make this commitment not as partisans of any political group but as followers of Jesus Christ, the crucified and risen Lord, who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

Human Life

The lives of the unborn, the disabled, and the elderly are ever more threatened. While public opinion has moved in a pro-life direction, powerful and determined forces are working to expand abortion, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide, and euthanasia. Although the protection of the weak and vulnerable is the first obligation of government, the power of government is today often enlisted in the cause of promoting what Pope John Paul II called “the culture of death.” We pledge to work unceasingly for the equal protection of every innocent human being at every stage of development and in every condition. We will refuse to permit ourselves or our institutions to be implicated in the taking of human life and we will support in every possible way those who, in conscience, take the same stand.

Marriage

The institution of marriage, already wounded by promiscuity, infidelity and divorce, is at risk of being redefined and thus subverted. Marriage is the original and most important institution for sustaining the health, education, and welfare of all. Where marriage erodes, social pathologies rise. The impulse to redefine marriage is a symptom, rather than the cause, of the erosion of the marriage culture. It reflects a loss of understanding of the meaning of marriage as embodied in our civil law as well as our religious traditions. Yet it is critical that the impulse be resisted, for yielding to it would mean abandoning the possibility of restoring a sound understanding of marriage and, with it, the hope of rebuilding a healthy marriage culture. It would lock into place the false and destructive belief that marriage is all about romance and other adult satisfactions, and not, in any intrinsic way, about the unique character and value of acts and relationships whose meaning is shaped by their aptness for the generation, promotion and protection of life. Marriage is not a “social construction,” but is rather an objective reality—the covenantal union of husband and wife—that it is the duty of the law to recognize, honor, and protect.

Religious Liberty

Freedom of religion and the rights of conscience are gravely jeopardized. The threat to these fundamental principles of justice is evident in efforts to weaken or eliminate conscience protections for healthcare institutions and professionals, and in anti- discrimination statutes that are used as weapons to force religious institutions, charities, businesses, and service providers either to accept (and even facilitate) activities and relationships they judge to be immoral, or go out of business. Attacks on religious liberty are dire threats not only to individuals, but also to the institutions of civil society including families, charities, and religious communities. The health and well-being of such institutions provide an indispensable buffer against the overweening power of government and is essential to the flourishing of every other institution—including government itself—on which society depends.

Unjust Laws

As Christians, we believe in law and we respect the authority of earthly rulers. We count it as a special privilege to live in a democratic society where the moral claims of the law on us are even stronger in virtue of the rights of all citizens to participate in the political process. Yet even in a democratic regime, laws can be unjust. And from the beginning, our faith has taught that civil disobedience is required in the face of gravely unjust laws or laws that purport to require us to do what is unjust or otherwise immoral. Such laws lack the power to bind in conscience because they can claim no authority beyond that of sheer human will.

Therefore, let it be known that we will not comply with any edict that compels us or the institutions we lead to participate in or facilitate abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide, euthanasia, or any other act that violates the principle of the profound, inherent, and equal dignity of every member of the human family.

Further, let it be known that we will not bend to any rule forcing us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality, marriage, and the family.

Further, let it be known that we will not be intimidated into silence or acquiescence or the violation of our consciences by any power on earth, be it cultural or political, regardless of the consequences to ourselves.

We will fully and ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar’s. But under no circumstances will we render to Caesar what is God’s.

I have not yet read the entire declaration available for download from their website, but I hope to get to it soon.

Who Signed It

There are literally hundreds of thousands of signers to this Declaration, but below are a few names I recognized from the main list of supporters.

Randy Alcorn
Founder and Director, Eternal Perspective Ministries (EPM) (Sandy, OR)
Kay Arthur
CEO and Co-founder, Precept Ministries International (Chattanooga, TN)
Gary Bauer
President, American Values; Chairman, Campaign for Working Families (Washington D.C.)
Ken Boa
President, Reflections Ministries (Atlanta, GA)
Timothy Clinton
President, American Association of Christian Counselors (Forest, VA)
Chuck Colson
Founder, the Chuck Colson Center for Christian Worldview (Lansdowne, VA)
Rev. Daniel Delgado
Board of Directors, National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference & Pastor, Third Day Missions Church (Staten Island, NY)
Dr. James Dobson
Founder, Focus on the Family (Colorado Springs, CO)
Dinesh D’Souza
Writer & Speaker (Rancho Santa Fe, CA)
Dr. Wayne Grudem
Research Professor of Theological and Biblical Studies, Phoenix Seminary (Phoenix, AZ)
Rev. Ken Hutcherson
Pastor, Antioch Bible Church (Kirkland, WA)
Rev. Tim Keller
Senior Pastor, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (New York, NY)
Dr. Richard Land
President, The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the SBC (Washington, DC)
Josh McDowell
Founder, Josh McDowell Ministries (Plano, TX)
Dr. Tom Oden
Theologian, United Methodist Minister and Professor, Drew University (Madison, NJ)
Marvin Olasky
Editor-in-Chief, World Magazine and provost, The Kings College (New York City, NY)
Dr. J.I. Packer
Board of GovernorsÕ Professor of Theology, Regent College (Canada)
Dr. Ron Sider
Director, Evangelicals for Social Action (Wynnewood, PA)
Joni Eareckson Tada
Founder and CEO, Joni and Friends International Disability Center (Agoura Hills, CA)
Paul Young
COO & Executive VP, Christian Research Institute (Charlotte, NC)
Ravi Zacharias
Founder and Chairman of the board, Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (Norcross, GA)

Here are my questions:

  • What do you think of this declaration?  Is it a genuine call to engage the Christian conscience or a compromise of our faith?
  • Will you sign the declaration? Why or why not?
  • If you sign it, would you really follow through with the call to civil disobedience and risk imprisonment?
  • Share/Bookmark