Not Just Selling Church

January 25th, 2007 No comments »
There is a pretty neat seafood company out there called Legal Sea Food. Their purpose statement is this…

At Legal Sea Foods, we are not just a restaurant selling fish. Rather we are a fish company in the restaurant business. This philosophy drives everything that we do…

It makes you wonder, what would it be like if Christians were not just in the business of selling “church”? Rather, what if we lived as a Divine-Family in the “business” of loving God and serving people? How would our churches look different if this were the philosophy that drove us every day? 

  • Would your Sunday experience change? 
  • Would your week look different?
  • Share/Bookmark

The Pharisees of American Politics

January 15th, 2007 No comments »

Since November 2006, there has been a political whirlwind of controversy surrounding the Minnesota Democrat Keith Ellison’s announced that he would take his Congressional oath of office on Islam’s holy book, the Koran.

According to reports in the Washington Post, it would seem that once again some Christian groups are keenly focused on the political ramifications.

Still, some conservative Christians have taken Prager’s editorial as a clarion call. The American Family Association in Tupelo, Miss., for example, sent out an “action alert” to its 3.4 million members urging them to write their legislators “to pass a law making the Bible the book used in the swearing-in ceremony of Representatives and Senators.”

Since when was the goal of our Faith to make politicians swear an oath on the Bible? Let me give you several reasons why this kind of political activism demonstrated by the American Family Association is destructive to our faith in Jesus.

First, anyone promoting this kind of legislation is breaking God’s Law that forbids idolatry. The ritual of putting ones hand on a copy of the Bible is nothing more than a superficial custom. This practice is not consistent with anything in our faith tradition and making this a human “law” will not in any way promote the Good News.

Second, Jesus condemned the swearing of public oaths; especially when they led to hypocrisy. Republican and Democrats alike break God’s Old Testament Law and the Law of Christ every day. Asking them to swear a public oath using a book they do not live by is exactly the thing that Jesus rejected.

Third, by focusing on passing meaningless laws, we distract Christians from the real importance of this event. Swearing an oath on the Koran and not the Bible does mark a significant change in our culture. We no longer live in a country dominated by a Christian worldview. But let us not forget, the Bible was not used in American tradition as a way to create Christian values, it reflected the worldview that already existed among the people of our nation. It does not work the other way and using the Bible in some outdated ritual will not change our culture one bit.

Finally, the biblical ignorance and moral arrogance of groups like the AFA is astounding. Next time the folks over at the AFA put their hand on the Bible, they should think about opening the book up and reading it. God gave Israel an entire book of Law, but it did not alter their moral compass (it was not supposed to). Does anyone think King Saul would have been a better leader if he had to swear an oath with his hand on the Torah? I guess the folks at the AFA think they can do a better job than YHWH and make more effective laws. The Pharisees would be proud!

Now its time for a reality check; we, the followers of Jesus, need to be less focused on such vain political activism and more concerned with honoring the Bible in our churches and personal lives. If we did a better job of submitting ourselves to the Spirit, we would not have to pass laws to honor the Scripture; it would already be in the hearts and minds of these elected leaders.

Let’s stop worrying about passing such foolish laws, and start getting serious about leading people into a life-changing encounter with Jesus.

* NOTE: I wrote the AFA on July 17, 2007 to make them aware of my criticism and have given them a fair opportunity to respond.

  • Share/Bookmark

America’s Most Inbred Churches

January 6th, 2007 No comments »

I was reading the most recent issue of Outreach Magazine, and was excited to go over their first ever list of “America’s Most Innovative Churches.” Overall, I ended up being very disappointed. Before I share my disappointment though, I want to share a couple positives. First, overall I think the magazine is a good one. Second, I had the pleasure of meeting the Editor, Lindy Lowry, over lunch back in May 2006 and was very impressed with her character and passion to serve Jesus. I think her vision for the magazine is wonderful and I pray the best for Lindy and the future of Outreach magazine.

Positives not withstanding, I was bothered by the list for one big reason; it offered more inbreeding than innovation.

It is hard to say the list really sought out the most innovative churches when it seems the panelists who selected the churches, selected their own churches. Now there is a disclaimer that no panelist was able to nominate their own church, but there seems to be a stunning lack of creativity in what churches made the list.

Mostly I was disappointed because this did not provide any new faces or offer a larger diversity from what we read on every other list from every other magazine. Most of these churches are also on other lists put out by Outreach—like their 100 fastest growing or 100 largest churches. So if we are just making lists of the same churches, what is the point? Inbreeding rarely leads to the kind of innovation we really want. I find it hard to believe that out of the hundreds of thousands of churches in the United States, the most “innovative” churches are the same ones that make every other list.

Ultimately I was hoping for a list that motivated me to innovate and create, but in the end, there does not seem to be much.

I applaud the effort to do something new and challenge us ministry leaders to innovate, and I hope next years list will lead the way by coming up with a list that demonstrates some greater innovation.

NOTE: I sent a copy of this post to Lindy because I wanted to give her a fair chance at responding to my comments. I hope you wont be mad at me dear sister.

  • Share/Bookmark

Pastors and the "Gift" of Pride.

January 3rd, 2007 No comments »

Is it possible that one of the “gifts” we look for in our pastors is the gift Pride? Do pastors choose to be senior or lead pastors just so they can always be right? It sure seems that in a lot of cases if someone does disagree with the pastor’s sermon or theology, they end up not being welcome in the church. They are painted as “trouble-makers” or “dissenters”. When did we decide that the pastor’s “vision” should determine the direction of the Church? When did we decide that vision is what unites us instead of the Holy Spirit?

I just wonder, have we enshrined the gift of pride and called it “leadership”?

  • Share/Bookmark