REVIEW: “Corinthian Elders”

May 10th, 2010 9 comments »

Review

"Corinthian Elders" by Jack Fortenberry

Jack Fortenberry is the author of a short essay entitled, “Corinthian Elders”.   His book was published in 2008 and Fortenberry recently emailed me and asked if I would read his book and review it for my readers.

The premise of Fortenberry’s book is that leaders in the Church can harm, not help, our relationship with Christ and hinder the Church’s ability to make disciples. Fortenberry supports this thesis by citing Paul’s admonition in 1 Cor 1-4 to not follow after a gifted speaker, but instead on the wisdom of Christ given to each follower through the Holy Spirit (17). Fortemberry writes:

For the church to present one or a few preachers to a passive audience who attend services because they enjoy the sermon or preaching style is a violation of Paul’s commandment to the Church.  Do we know better than Paul? (15)… Giftedness, as some consider oratory skills in professional preachers, may in fact be detrimental to a demonstration of the Spirit’s working as indicated by Paul in 1 Corinthians 2:4… (23)

Fortenberry’s main concern is that the system of hiring professional speakers or Elders encourages people to follow after “favorite” speakers instead of the leadership of the Spirit among the saints (32-33) .

Fortenberry’s book goes on to say that consensus leadership is the New Testament model of how the church should be governed (46).  Additionally, he concludes, that no Elder should ever receive any money in support of their ministry to the flock (55-56).

Summary

I have some points of disagreement on the topics of giving financial support to Elders (read more),  and I would like to read a more thorough treatment from Fortenberry on how he is using the term “leader” (read more).   Overall, “Corinthian Elders” is a good contribution to the ongoing reformation of the church in the West and the emphasis on following Christ and allowing the Holy Spirit to teach us is a much needed reminder to the church at large.

  • Share/Bookmark

Walking With The Risen Jesus – Week 4

May 9th, 2010 No comments »

Meditation

"Ancient-Future Faith" Robert Webber

This is why the church as a fellowship in faith emphasizes the divine presence taking form in a new fabric of human relationships—a fellowship of people. This fellowship shares a corporate life. For example, Luke describes the early Christians as being of “one heart and one soul” (Acts 4:32). They even sold their possessions and lived in common, although, as the rebellion of Ananais and Sapphira illustrates, this original common community was difficult to administrate. Living together was not easy, and the principles of being the church together had to be learned as each member of the community submitted to the rule of Christ. But faith in the end was to overcome the boundaries that separated people, transcending racial, economic, and sexual differences. “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female” (Gal. 3:28). The character of the “fellowship in faith” is to be far different from the character of other communities.

 

The difference is rooted in a common slavery to Jesus Christ. The image of a slave, so often overlooked, is an image that Paul often used of himself in relation to other believers, “For we do not preach ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, and ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake” (2 Cor. 4:5). A slavery to God immediately transforms relations on the horizontal level. No longer can one person “lord it” over another. All God’s people are equal before God and each other. For this reason the church is called the “family of God” (1 Peter 4:17). We all serve in God’s house under God’s authority. Thus, the church is a fellowship in faith, a corporate existence under God, a mutual slavery to each other.
The church as the realized experience of the “fellowship of faith” will break down our extreme individualism. Modern individualism is something different from a personal relationship with God in Christ. It is a form of Christianity that fails to understand the integral relationship that exists between the members of Christ’s body. We need to reflect on the teaching of Ignatius, bishop of Antioch (A.D. 110), who wrote to the Ephesian church: “your accord and harmonious love is a hymn to Jesus Christ.” When the “fellowship in faith” is actualized, the church as a true fellowship makes Christianity real to the individual, as Ignatius indicated when he described the church “as a choir able to sing in unison and [with] one voice.” The mandate to break through the faÁade of individualism and create dynamic Christian relationships is demonstrated in this new fabric of human relations.

Consequently, the challenge of the church in the postmodern world is to recover community within the local church and the community of the entire church throughout history. We must learn that we are members of the whole church, the living and the dead, who constitute the fellowship in faith. Our calling is to deconstruct our sectarianism and to enter into dialogue with the whole church with the intent of recovering our relationship to the whole family of God—Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant. The more we experience the “fellowship in faith,” the more deeply we will experience the church as the body of Christ, a body that will attract and hold the postmodern seeker.

Robert Webber, Ancient-Future Faith : Rethinking Evangelicalism for a Postmodern World (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1999), 79-81.

Scripture

  • Acts 4:32-37
  • Galatians 3:26-29
  • 2 Corinthians 4:5-6
  • 1 Peter 4:16-17

Challenge

We, as followers f Jesus, are called to live in community and for community (church).  If you really took this challenge seriously, how would it change the way you practice your faith on a daily and weekly basis?  What do you need to give up?  What do you need to embrace?

  • Share/Bookmark

REVIEW: “The Community Life of God”

April 27th, 2010 8 comments »

Introduction

Milt Rodriguez is the author of “The Community Life of God.”  Rodriguez contacted me some time ago to asked if I would review his book.  I was intrigued by the topic of the book and agreed to post my thoughts.

Rodriguez is involved in the Organic Church movement and his book is endorsed by author Frank Viola and house church advocate Jon Zens.  ”The Community Life of God” attempts to lay both a practical and theological foundation for the Trinity as the model of all relationships.

What Works

The strength of this book is Rodriguez’s emphasis on the practical need within the church to build deep relationships.  Rodriguez writes, “Building  cannot happen with stones who occasionally and casually meet together (106).”  Community life only happens when there is a deep investment and willingness to sacrifice for others.  Rodriguez argues that as the Trinity works in concert, so too each member of the church must eschew individualism and work together to fulfill the purpose of God (130).

David Flowers has a good summary of what works well in this book.  Flowers writes,

Rodriguez proposes that much of Christian activity today is spent furthering the individualistic mindset that is so popular in our culture. Even when believers come together corporately there is not an understanding of God’s image among us. Church life ought to be more than socializing and individual Christian ministries.

On this point I think every Christian can agree and aspire.

What Needs Work

The book started off a bit rough for me.  The introductory chapter has some awkwardly worded paragraphs that are more confusing than helpful.  For example, the following paragraph is supposed to define God’s purpose in the creation of man.

Why did God create?  What was the motivational factor in the creation?  I think that we can safely say the He created in order to put His plan into action; to take the first step toward fulfilling His purpose.  You see, there is the purpose, but then there is His plan to fulfill the purpose.  The purpose is His goal.  The plan is the way to achieve that goal. The apostle Paul speaks of this “plan” in his letter to the Ephesians.

“Why did God create?”  This paragraph does not help answer the question and quite honestly the entire introduction to the books is more frustrating than insightful.

At times, Rodriguez tries to lecture the reader.  He writes,

Now please pay attention very carefully.

When you just read my quotation of that verse in Colossians you immediately took that verse and applied it to you as an individual (49).

Stylistically, it is a bit off-putting when a writer lectures the reader about what they think or feel. Some readers may not mind this approach, but for me it created a barrier.  Writing style aside, the bigger issue is Rodriguez’s theology.

In Rodriguez’s effort to counter the individualistic church culture, he tends to overstate his case.  In this example, Rodriguez asserts that anyone who says they are, as an individual, made in the image of Christ is repeating a lie of Satan.

Yet I hear believers talking all the time about being “like Jesus”or being “like Christ.”  Yet the scriptures do not ever teach that you, as an individual, can be like Christ.  That again, is the delusion of the ole’ serpant.  You cannot be like Jesus.  You were never meant to be like Jesus (52).

While I agree with Rodriguez that community is key to being conformed to the image of Christ, this in no way precludes the meaning for the individual disciple.

The most disconcerting aspect of Rodriguez’s theology is his bent toward “Open Theism”    That is, Rodriguez takes the “community” of God’s being  as analogous to the “community” of humanity (see Smith, Fred, “Does Classical Theism Deny God’s Immanence?” vol. 160, Bibliotheca Sacra Volume 160, 637 (Dallas, TX: Dallas Theological Seminary, 2003), 22-24.).  Here is a sampling of quotes where Rodriguez’s theology should be critically examined.

“From God’s perspective, Christ is no longer a single person. He is a corporate person, Christ and the Church are a single reality (87).” Quoting Frank Viola’s book, “From Here to Eternity”

“The Man is a new creation, a new species.  He is made up of both God and Man.  He is composed of both divinity and humanity.  God and man have been merged together as one in Christ (88).

“Who is in charge [of the church]?”  Christ is in charge.  A Christ who is made up of both the Head and the Body.  The One New Man(141).”

Ultimately, Rodriguez’s book blurs important distinction between the Creator and the Created.. and key difference between Christ and the Church.

Summary

There is no need, nor any biblical root, for connecting the essential “community-life” of Church with the “community-life” of the Trinity.  There is a significant amount of Scripture that teaches the necessity of community that stands on its own without reading into it a philosophical paradigm that recreates God in the image of humanity.  We, as the Church, can achieve a practical community life without the kind of “creative” theology embraced in “The Community Life of God.

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Walking with the Risen Jesus – Week 3

April 25th, 2010 No comments »

Meditation

The Ant and the Chrysalis – Aesop’s Fables

An Ant nimbly running about in the sunshine in search of food came across a Chrysalis that was very near its time of change. The Chrysalis moved its tail, and thus attracted the attention of the Ant, who then saw for the first time that it was alive. “Poor, pitiable animal!” cried the Ant disdainfully. “What a sad fate is yours!  While I can run hither and thither, at my pleasure, and, if I wish, ascend the tallest tree, you lie imprisoned here in your shell, with power only to move a joint or two of your scaly tail.” The Chrysalis heard all this, but did not try to make any reply. A few days after, when the Ant passed that way again, nothing but the shell remained.  Wondering what had become of its contents, he felt himself suddenly shaded and fanned by the gorgeous wings of a beautiful Butterfly. ”Behold in me,” said the Butterfly, “your much-pitied friend! Boast now of your powers to run and climb as long as you can get me to listen.” So saying, the Butterfly rose in the air, and, borne along and aloft on the summer breeze, was soon lost to the sight of the Ant forever.

Scripture

  • Luke 24:13-31
  • Job 28:20-24
  • Psalm 139:14-17
  • Colossians 1:24-29

Challenge

The simple lesson of Aesop’s Fable is  that often the truth is often hidden from us.  I frequent the Logos Bible Software forums where people often make bold assertions, and even become angry because of some perceived offense.  More often than not, their perception is changed when they take the time to get all the facts.  Even then, people are sometimes so committed to their belief, nothing can change their opinion.  Have you even been in a situation like that where you thought the answer was so clear, but then as time went, and your knowledge grew, on you changed your opinion?  These mundane examples from daily life only illustrate the problem as it pertains to our deeper spirituality.  Ravi Zacharias has observed the following traits among all people.

  1. Finite Knowledge: No matter how smart or wise we are, there are gaps in our knowledge.  We cannot know everything or see every side of an issue.
  2. Propensity to Believe: When confronted with a circumstance that causes discomfort, we tend to fill the void with our own beliefs.  Ultimately we distort the reality of the situation and create a false sense of safety.
  3. Power of Deception: We are all susceptible to manipulation from others who are more than willing to take advantage of our weaknesses and lead us into destruction.

As we seek to walk the path that Jesus has laid out for us, we must be aware of our own limitations and learn to trust in the purpose, power, and presence of God in us.

  1. What are the “gaps” in your knowledge that are causing you the most frustration and fear?
  2. Are you filling those gaps with something solid or with convenient beliefs?  How can you tell the difference?
  3. Who are the people speaking wisdom into your life?  Are they voices of deception telling you what you want to hear or voices of love telling you the hard truth?
  • Share/Bookmark